Supreme Court refuses to reconsider 2006 order on SC/ST quota for promotions

September 26, 2018

The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to refer the 2006 judgment, which ended quotas in promotions for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes, to a larger bench but ruled that there was no need to provide “quantifiable to show the communities needed the affirmative action.

The Supreme Court, in the 2006 M Nagraj case, had said states are bound to provide quantifiable data on the backwardness of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), the facts about their inadequate representation in government jobs and the overall administrative efficiency, before providing quota in promotions to members of these communities.

The government had strongly backed restoring quotas in promotions for SCs and STs, arguing that these communities had suffered social inequalities for years and, for the purpose of extending them reservations in government jobs promotions, it should be presumed that they remain underprivileged communities even now.

During arguments, the Centre’s top law officer KK Venugopal had argued that it was impossible to comply with conditions laid down by the court because the data will keep on fluctuating and filling up vacancies is a dynamic and continuous process.

The 2006 verdict effectively implied that scheduled caste and scheduled tribes employees could get guaranteed promotions only if the government produces hard data to demonstrate the “compelling reasons” such as backwardness of the community and their inadequate representation in government.

For all practical purposes, the older verdict had sealed any possibility of extending quota benefits to serving employees. Dalit groups argue this had adversely affected the career progression of SC/ST employees because of an inherent bias against them.


“Having Quota in promotions after getting in job is like giving bread to a overfeed person ! How shameless our leaders and courts are to even support this useless act openly just for mere votes !!” – Editor, Vedic Upasna Peeth


Source : Hindustan Times 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Vedic Upasana Peeth or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Vedic Upasana Peeth and Vedic Upasana Peeth is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​
© 2021. Vedic Upasna. All rights reserved. Origin IT Solution