SC declines plea for urgent hearing of petitions seeking review of Sabarimala verdict


October 9, 2018

Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi on Tuesday denied an oral plea for urgent listing of review petitions filed against the September 28 judgment of the Supreme Court allowing the entry of women of all ages into the famed Sabarimala temple even as Kerala is yet to come to terms with the verdict.

The Chief Justice rejected the oral mentioning made by advocate Mathews Nedumpara, representing one of the review pleas filed by Shylaja Vijayan, president of the National Ayyappa Devotees Association. The lawyer wanted the court to take up the review pleas before the court closes for Dussehra holidays on October 12. A plea to stay the Sabarimala judgment was also declined.

The review petitions argue that ‘reform’ does not mean rendering a religious practice out of existence on the basis of a PIL filed by “third parties” who do not believe in the Sabarimala deity.

A Constitution Bench of the apex court, in a majority of 4:1, had upheld the 12-year-old PIL filed by Indian Young Lawyers Association challenging the prohibition on women aged between 10 and 50 from undertaking the pilgrimage to Sabarimala temple. The Bench found that a restriction on women solely based on her menstrual status was a smear on her individual dignity. It was like “treating women as the children of a lesser God is to blink at the Constitution”. It was a “form of untouchability” abolished decades ago. The ban on women was derogatory to equal citizenship. The right to practice religion should yield to the right of dignity of women aged between 10 and 50.

The Nair Service Society (NSS), in its review petition settled by senior advocate K. Parasaran and filed by advocate K.V. Mohan, contended that the court should take judicial notice that an “overwhelmingly large section of women worshippers are supporting the custom of prohibiting entry of females between the age of 10 and 50 years at Sabarimala temple”.

The lifting of the prohibition at the instance of third parties, in spite of opposition by a large section of women worshippers, is anomalous, the petition said.

The review filed by Chetna Conscience of Women, represented by advocate K.V. Muthu Kumar, argued that a Pandora’s box would be opened if a constitutional court began entertaining petitions which purely pertain to faith, customs, practices and beliefs.

 

“Surprising is, SC can hear petition at 12 AM in night. Sc can hear for so called bollywood actors immediately but not for Hindus issues !”- Editor, Vedic Upasana Peeth

 

Source : The Hindu



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post


Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Vedic Upasana Peeth or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Vedic Upasana Peeth and Vedic Upasana Peeth is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​
© 2019. Vedic Upasna. All rights reserved. Origin IT Solution