Indian Express and Hindustan Times reject article asking uncomfortable questions about Shah Faesal


JANUARY 18, 2019

Khalid Shah examines the paradox of victim of terrorism turning into supporters of ‘sentiments’ of terrorists and as the article on Shah Faesal did not suit the narrative of media houses, they refused to publish it.

IAS officer Shah Faesal made national headlines when he resigned from the service earlier this month. The young officer said that he is resigning “to protest against the unabated killings in Kashmir and lack of any sincere reach-out from the Union Government”. The UPSC entrance test topper had also complained about “marginalization and invisibilization of around 200 million Indian Muslims at the hands of Hindutva forces reducing them to second-class citizens”. Basically, he was reflecting the views similar to the views of Kashmiri separatists. His comments were a big irony because he himself is a victim of terrorism in the valley, his father was brutally killed by terrorists, and now his thoughts are in alignment of the thoughts of his father’s killers.

Jammu and Kashmir is known for such paradox when it comes to terrorism. While on the one hand, the state participates in democratic process like voting in elections, the state also sees massive participation in the funeral procession of terrorists killed by security forces. Highlighting such paradoxes, Observer Research Foundation’s (ORF) associate fellow Khalid Shah has written an article, taking Shah Faesal’s turnaround as an example. The article is critical of Faesal, as the victim of the ‘sentiment’) is now positioning himself as a sympathiser of the champions of ‘resistance’ who promote gun, militancy and violence.

The article was sent to two prominent newspapers for publishing, but both of them refused to print it. The article was rejected by Indian Express and Hindustan Times.

Khalid Shah examines how both the terrorists and the victims of the same terrorists are martyrs in Kashmir. He also describes how while thousands attend funeral processions of terrorists, the victims of terrorism are forgotten quickly.

The rejection of the article by two prominent newspapers shows how mainstream media work to build a narrative. As the article didn’t suit the narrative they want to peddle, they refused to publish it. Khalid Shah has asked some very uncomfortable questions, how the victims of terrorism eventually become supporters of the same ideologies that drive the terrorists, which seems to too hot for the mainstream media to handle.

Source: OpIndia.com



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post


Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Vedic Upasana Peeth or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Vedic Upasana Peeth and Vedic Upasana Peeth is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​
© 2017. Vedic Upasna. All rights reserved. Origin IT Solution