41-day abstinence for Sabarimala pilgrimage is impossible: SC

July 20, 2018

Sabarimala temple board’s condition making it mandatory for Lord Ayyappa devotees to observe 41-day abstinence before undertaking the pilgrimage was impossible and was aimed at justifying the age restriction on female devotees, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.

“This is imposition of an impossible condition that one has to observe a 41-day abstinence… You are imposing it. You put 41 days so that a woman can’t go. What you cannot do in law is being done by imposing this condition. You are doing it indirectly,” Chief Justice Dipak Misra remarked.

A constitution bench led by the CJI is hearing petitions wanting to lift the ban on women devotees aged between 10 and 50. Arguments remained inconclusive and will continue on July 24.

 The CJI’s observation came after senior advocate Parasaran told the bench that it should not try to change the character of the deity in Sabarimala. CJI Misra said the condition was imposed to make it impossible for women to visit the shrine.

“If you are saying the deity is not a naishtika brahmachari, you are changing its character of God,” Parasaran, appearing for the Nair Service Society, told the CJI after the latter prodded him for a philosophical explanation.

Senior advocate AM Singhvi, appearing for the Devaswom Board, which runs the over 800-year-old temple, defended the custom and said the restriction was in view of the nature of the installation “which is supposed to depict “naishtika brahmacharya” (perennial brahmacharya)”.

 Justice Indu Malhotra asked the petitioner’s counsel about another temple in Kerala that does not allow entry for men. She later pointed out: “Aren’t there similar beliefs in other religions also? I believe it was there in the Old Testament also?” To which Sighvi replied that such practices were there in all cultures and religions.

SOURCE : Hindustan Times

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post

Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Vedic Upasana Peeth or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Vedic Upasana Peeth and Vedic Upasana Peeth is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​
© 2021. Vedic Upasna. All rights reserved. Origin IT Solution