HC raps Kerala govt, says it has no right to interfere in daily affairs of Sabarimala temple


November 5, 2018

Coming down heavily on the state government, the Kerala High Court Monday made it clear that it had no right to interfere in the day-to-day affairs of the Ayyappa temple at Sabarimala and its role was confined to maintaining law and order in the area.

The court also flayed the government and the police over causing hardships to the pilgrims trekking to Sabarimala for the “darshan” of Lord Ayyappa.

The criticism came hours before the temple opened in the evening for the special “Sree Chitira Atta Thirunal” puja Tuesday, marking the birthday of the last king of Travancore — Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma. The temple will close at 10 pm Tuesday.

This is the second time the shrine opened for “darshan” after the Supreme Court allowed the entry of women of all ages into it.

A plea was filed by Ramesh of Mylapore in Tamil Nadu, seeking a direction from the court that the government and the chief minister had no authority to interfere in the day-to-day affairs of the shrine.

When it came up for hearing, the court clarified that the government’s role was confined to maintaining law and order in the area.

It could not interfere with the affairs of the temple management and dictate to the Devaswom (temple administration) Board, a division bench comprising justices P R Ramachandra Menon and N Anilkumar said.

Criticising the police for writing down the names and addresses of all the pilgrims who were on their way to Sabarimala for the special pooja, the court asked whether the government intended to “conduct something else”.

It also questioned the police action of preventing the media from carrying out their professional duties at Sabarimala.

Though the government reiterated that there was no ban imposed on the media, the court expressed its displeasure.


It also said no harassment under the guise of implementing the Supreme Court verdict should be meted out to the pilgrims.

“You can’t cause hardships to pilgrims,” the court said and directed the government to file a detailed affidavit.

The division bench stressed the need to maintain the rule of law at Sabarimala.

On the police action in Nilackal during the monthly pooja last month, the court said from the materials available, it could be seen that a group of police personnel was indulging in damaging two-wheelers parked on the roadside.

Prima facie, it could not be treated as discharge of official duty, the bench said and directed the state attorney to provide a list with the names of those involved.

The court also directed the state police chief to conduct a preliminary inquiry directly or through a highly-placed officer in the matter and submit the list.

Unprecedented security arrangements have been put in place in the backdrop of protests staged by devotees and Hindu outfits from October 17-22, opposing the Left government’s decision to implement the apex court verdict permitting women of all ages to offer prayers at the hill shrine.

 

“Government should have no right to interfere in temple work as government has no knowledge about subtle phase of dharma so the decision would be intellect based.”- Editor, Vedic Upasana Peeth

 

Source : Hindustan Times 



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Post


Notice : The source URLs cited in the news/article might be only valid on the date the news/article was published. Most of them may become invalid from a day to a few months later. When a URL fails to work, you may go to the top level of the sources website and search for the news/article.

Disclaimer : The news/article published are collected from various sources and responsibility of news/article lies solely on the source itself. Vedic Upasana Peeth or its website is not in anyway connected nor it is responsible for the news/article content presented here. ​Opinions expressed in this article are the authors personal opinions. Information, facts or opinions shared by the Author do not reflect the views of Vedic Upasana Peeth and Vedic Upasana Peeth is not responsible or liable for the same. The Author is responsible for accuracy, completeness, suitability and validity of any information in this article. ​
© 2017. Vedic Upasna. All rights reserved. Origin IT Solution